Movie Review: Dilwale (2015)

Dilwale1.5 Stars (out of 4)

Buy or rent the movie at iTunes
Buy the DVD at Amazon
Buy the soundtrack at Amazon

Dilwale is a generic Frankenstein cobbled together from elements of countless other Bollywood comedies and romantic dramas, lurching from one predictable plot point to the next. Given the talent and budget at director Rohit Shetty’s disposal, the result is disappointing.

Shahrukh Khan plays Raj, a man absurdly devoted to the happiness of his younger brother, Veer (Varun Dhawan), so much so that he tears up and starts to shake whenever anyone mentions having a younger brother. Raj’s big secret is that he was adopted and is not Veer’s biological brother.

So Shahrukh plays a character with the same name as the one he made famous in Dilwale Dulhania Le Jayenge, with the same backstory as the one he played in Kabhi Khushi Kabhie Gham. See what I mean about Frankenstein?

When Veer falls in love with a beautiful woman named Ishita (Kriti Sanon) — whom he calls Ishu just so he can repeatedly say, “Ishu, this is a big issue” — it prompts Raj to flashback to his own failed romance.

With no scene transition of which to speak, we are transported fifteen years into the past, when “Raj” went by the name Kaali and worked as a gangster in Bulgaria. There he meets a lovely artist named Meera (Kajol, Shakrukh’s love interest both DDLJ and K3G), and they break each other’s hearts. Surely this can’t be the last we see of Meera, right?

The plot unfolds predictably, as obstacles arise in Veer’s and Raj’s paths to romance. These obstacles would disappear if Raj and Meera would stop withholding information that is unpleasant but not earth-shattering, but writer Yunus Sajawal can’t seem to think of a better way to delay the inevitable happy ending for more than two-and-a-half hours.

Further dragging out the film is a ridiculous anti-drug subplot that could not have been handled with any less subtlety. Boman Irani plays the world’s cuddliest drug kingpin, King. When King’s men try to strongarm a barkeep named Uncle Joe into dealing their goods — by banging a huge bag of weed on the cashier stand, in front of everyone in the bar — Uncle Joe responds with some incredibly direct dialogue (courtesy of writers Sajid-Farhad): “I won’t sell your drugs here. Youngsters come here to have fun.”

The “Drugs are bad, m’kay?” subplot reaches its hypocritical crescendo when Veer, his sidekick Siddhu (Varun Sharma), and well-meaning miscreant Mani (Johnny Lever), get completely drunk on booze and self-righteousness while burning a bag of King’s drugs.

Siddhu is the fourth comic role I’ve seen Sharma play, which I think gives me enough information to definitively say that Varun Sharma is not funny.

But being funny isn’t really the point in Dilwale, where roles are cast not by suitability but by similarity. Need some outrageous older comic bit players? Hire Lever and Sanjay Mishra. Does the bad guy need a bald right-hand man? Hire Pradeep Kabra.

The whole movie is uninspired because the point is not to do anything unique or innovative but to evoke memories of earlier, better films starring the same people. The only way Shetty could have tried any less hard would be not to have made the movie at all.

By only looking to the past for inspiration, Dilwale winds up peppered with sexist insults. Siddhu repeatedly steals from Veer, but he’s forgiven because he says that he only did it so that he could take his girlfriend to the movies and out for coffee. The incident is brushed off by the men onscreen, who agree that women are greedy and high-maintenance.

Jokes are also made about Kajol’s weight, based on the assumption that she — like all women — is perpetually dieting. What is this, a Cathy comic strip from 1982? Beyond being tacky and outdated, the jokes are undermined by the fact that Kajol is stunning. Her gorgeousness is the movie’s lone selling point.

There is a stretch of a few minutes when Kajol saves a scene that should be stupid, and one briefly thinks, “Ooh, this could get interesting.” That hope is short-lived when Meera falls in love with Raj just because he loves her. To quote Cathy, “Ack!”

Kajol is better than this. Shahrukh is usually better than this. Varun is definitely better than this. Kriti’s character is so level-headed that she seems like she wandered onto the wrong set. Dilwale is not the Kajol-Shahrukh romantic reunion we deserve.

Links

Advertisements

20 thoughts on “Movie Review: Dilwale (2015)

  1. Uday

    Oh I so agree! After that twist with Kajol, I wondered how the hell were they gonna get from that juncture to the song Gerua! But in a mind-boggling way, it happens just a handful of minutes later! Probably should have walked out right then. This is so not the movie I wanted to see.

    Reply
  2. safanta92

    You are absolutely right. This is not what we deserve, but I think Dilwale is made for SRK, that’s it, and Kajol rope in, they are doomed. I mean, Rohit Shetty never do a romance movie (he tried to Chennai Express) and we want more if it is about SRK and Kajol. So hardly I accepted the flaws, they can’t make more than that, in gangster there’s no love story, and vice versa, I think.
    It turned out that the movie is scattered, in one point, the romance could be developed, but Rohit’s specialty is in Goa’s side story. Sanjay Mishra and Johnny Lever really killing it, and Varun, is somehow being Shinu (Main Tera Hero) and Kriti Sanon is no help either.

    Reply
  3. missnewyorkxoxo

    The movie has been receiving mixed reviews and the negative review should turn me away from this movie, but I blindly follow any Shahrukh and Kajol pairing and add in Varun. Yeah, I think it is probably too late to save me. Haha. Great review.

    Reply
  4. Pingback: This Week, Part 1 (Dec. 25-27, 2015) – Online Film Critics Society

  5. Andy

    Given how unbearable a good movie like “Jab Tak Hai Jaan” was, I am surprised DilwaleDilwale made as much money as it did

    Reply
    1. Kathy Post author

      There aren’t as many “event” films in Bollywood as there are in Hollywood, and this one certainly qualified. The interest appears to have been short-lived, as Bajirao Mastani’s total earnings in the US have already surpassed those of Dilwale.

      Reply
  6. Pingback: This Week, Part 2 (Dec. 25-27, 2015) – Online Film Critics Society

  7. Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: January 4, 2016 | Access Bollywood

  8. Pingback: Opening January 8: Wazir | Access Bollywood

  9. Ehinome Okojie

    It was expected to finish behind Bajirao Mastani in North America, the real surprise is in India where Bajirao started firing way ahead in its second week, one In guess SRK was desperate to make money from this film and I heard RCE made over 160cr from thsi film, it is also profitable for UTV but the real problem is that the subdistributors in india barring the border regions lost huge sums of money. BOI.com gave it a semi hit verdict. It will be interesting to see Raees because Rahul Dholakia is such a talented diorector however Fan may cater for certain urban Indian sensibilities.

    Reply
    1. Kathy Post author

      It seems like, at least in the US, everyone who went to see Dilwale in its first weekend went on to watch Bajirao Mastani later, but a lot of the crowd that saw BM first decided to pass on Dilwale. The story of Raees sounds pretty interesting, so I’m expecting it to do well here, but I have no idea what to make of Fan. It will be an interesting year, for sure.

      Reply
  10. Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: January 8-10 | Access Bollywood

  11. Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: January 15-17 | Access Bollywood

  12. Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: January 22-24 | Access Bollywood

  13. Pingback: Streaming Video News: February 1, 2017 | Access Bollywood

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s