Buy the DVD at Amazon
Buy the soundtrack at Amazon
Even at their best, writer-director Anees Bazmee’s movies are mediocre. At their worst, they are unbearable. Welcome Back is one of the worst.
In the eight years since the events of Welcome, gangsters Uday (Nana Patekar) and Majnu (Anil Kapoor) have left their criminal pasts behind, striking it rich as hoteliers in Dubai. Deciding that it’s time to get married and start their own families, they fall for the same woman: an heiress named Chandni (Ankita Shrivastava), who’s always accompanied by her mother, Maharani (Dimple Kapadia).
The guys’ marriage plans are put on hold when Uday’s father (also played by Patekar) reveals that Uday has another sister — Ranjhana (Shruti Haasan) — he needs marry off first. The “decent” guy they find for her, Ajju (John Abraham), turns out to be a don pretending to be something he’s not — just like Uday and Majnu.
The plot unfolds at furious pace but burns out quickly. After the first thirty minutes or so, very little that happens feels necessary. Everything else appears to be the indulgence of Bazmee’s whims. Helicopters? Camels? Vampire dance party? Check.
Welcome Back‘s story spins so far out of control that Bazmee doesn’t even try to give the film a real ending. He leaves his characters hanging in mid-air, literally and figuratively.
Watching the film becomes an endurance test in the second half, when Naseeruddin Shah shows up as yet another don, Wanted Bhai. At this point, Welcome Back descends to Gunda-level geographic incoherence. Wanted lives in a mansion on an island only accessible by plane. Yet — while on the island — Uday and Majnu are able to drive to a desert and to a mountain range. They also find a graveyard on the island, evoking more memories of Gunda:
It’s hard for any performances to stand out in a movie that requires its characters to behave so stupidly, but Shrivastava is pretty good as a gold digger. Her covert expressions of disgust while wooing the much older bachelors are funny. Kapadia is also exceedingly glamorous.
Another member of the cast stands out for the wrong reasons. Shiney Ahuja plays Wanted’s drug-addicted son, Honey, who is obsessed with Ranjhana. (Azmee doesn’t even bother explaining how Honey knows Ranjhana.)
In 2011, Ahuja was convicted of raping a member of his household staff and sentenced to seven years in prison. He is out on bail while appealing his conviction (a major difference from the American justice system, where sentences are effective immediately, and appeals are adjudicated while the defendant is behind bars).
Azmee says that he didn’t take Ahuja’s conviction into account when casting him in Welcome Back, simply believing that Ahuja fit the part. “I am a filmmaker,” Bazmee told IANS, “and I do not think about anything more than that.”
Are we supposed to believe that there were no other actors who could have played this particular supporting role? While Azmee may not be bothered by Ahuja’s criminal past, many people will be. When we see Ahuja grinding on Shrivastava in a “sexy” dance number, it’s impossible not to reminded of the fact that he was convicted of sexually assaulting a woman.
Acting in films is a privilege, not a right. There was no reason for Azmee to cast Ahuja in this role at the expense of another actor without a violent criminal past. If Azmee can’t appreciate why this is a problem, is he the right person to helm a multi-million dollar film?
- Welcome Back at Wikipedia
- Welcome Back at IMDb
- “Shiney Ahuja, fallen Bollywood star, jailed for raping maid” at The Guardian
- “Didn’t think about reactions before casting Shiney” at The Times of India
- My review of Welcome
- My review of Gunda
Thank you for your review. Would you believe that I always read your reviews before watching any Hindi movie than reading Rotten Tomatoes and others? You do an awesome job! Keep it up 🙂
The thing that encouraged me to write to you for the first time ever, is the Shiney Ahuja case details. I am not sure how updated you are with regards to the case but it has been known for a long time now that the maid who had charged him for rape and sexual assualt, has, in fact, confessed that she was lying and just wanted to be famous and get some compensation out of him. Consequently, he has been released, pending investigation. In the American Justice system, I am sure the adage, “Innocent until proven guilty” holds, correct? So, why malign the Indian Judicial System and a supposedly innocent person?
Just my two cents 🙂 As I mentioned, I LOVE your reviews and the fact that you are non-Indian reviewing Hindi movies makes me proud that our movies do reach far and wide. So, please don’t take any offense to my remarks.
Take care and have a nice week ahead!
Thanks for being a loyal reader, and thank you for being so polite in your disagreement with me. I appreciate it.
Regarding Shiney’s case, though many believe him to be innocent, he is legally guilty until an appellate judge invalidates his conviction (assuming that he wins his appeal, which is not guaranteed). My point is that there are so many other actors who are desperate for work, why cast someone with such a massive cloud hanging over his head? Just go with another actor until Shiney wins his appeal or finishes serving his sentence.
Thanks for writing, Himanshu. All the best! — Kathy
Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: September 4-6 | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Opening September 11: Hero and Meet the Patels | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: September 11-13 | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Opening September 18: Katti Batti | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: September 18-20 | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Opening September 25: Kis Kisko Pyaar Karoon | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: September 25-27 | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: January 4, 2016 | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Worst Bollywood Movies of 2015 | Access Bollywood