Tag Archives: Aditya Kumar

Movie Review: Dug Dug (2021)

3 Stars (out of 4)

Watch Dug Dug on Amazon Prime

A man’s accidental death births a religious cult when his motorcycle appears to move with a will of its own. Writer-director Ritwik Pareek’s feature debut Dug Dug is delightfully odd.

At a roadside stand along a busy trucking route at night, Thakur Sa (Altaf Khan) stumbles towards his motorcycle. He’s drunk and in no condition to drive, especially not after he smokes a joint. Thakur stands in front of a sign that makes it look he has like a halo encircling his head. Church bells ring. He slings his helmet over his arm and takes off on his bike, driving “into the light” of oncoming traffic. We know what’s going to happen.

Thakur makes it surprisingly far on his doomed final ride. Cinematographer Aditya Kumar uses the available light from the truck stop, passing vehicles, and Thakur’s own bike to paint a strangely beautiful picture of a world in transit. The score by Salvage Audio Collective is propulsive and tense, filled with anticipation more than dread.

On a side road off of the highway, Thakur is distracted by a billboard advertising a magic show. He falls off his bike in front of the painted image of a sorcerer and is promptly run over by a truck. The police collect Thakur’s body and bring his motorcycle back to the station. The next morning, the bike is gone.

Despite their efforts to lock up the blue motorcycle with a pink seat, it keeps reappearing at the spot where Thakur died, day after day. The townsfolk are left to wonder what it means. Did God use Thakur’s death to send a message? If so, what is it? How are they supposed to give this miracle the respect it deserves?

Thus unfolds Pareek’s satire of the commercialization of religion. Thakur — a drunk driver — is turned into a saint, and his sainthood spins off into business and marketing opportunities.

Dug Dug opens with a standard onscreen note that it is a work of fiction inspired by real events. Midway through the movie, a similar statement appears again on screen, reiterating that, while names have been changed, this is based on a true story.

The double clarification is an attempt to diffuse any potential anger from devotees of the “Bullet Baba Shrine” in Rajasthan, the true story on which Dug Dug is based. However, there’s no hint of disrespect in Pareek’s film, which admits that faith is complicated and highly personal.

Other than noting how ready people are to monetize a miracle, Pareek is careful not to make fun of the devotees. The town’s young police officer Pyare Lal (Gaurav Soni) refuses to participate in the new traditions of dropping money in a collection box and pouring booze on the motorcycle’s tires, but he doesn’t stop anyone else from doing so. The whole tone of the film is observational, not judgmental. The natural acting by the charming cast reinforces that.

Dug Dug moves at a languid pace that suits the sleepy rural town where it’s set. It bogs down in the latter stages with prolonged, repetitive musical montages of people handing over money, praying, and waving flags. Other than that slow section, Dug Dug showcases the talent of an intriguing new filmmaker with a distinct style and point of view. I’m looking forward to see what Pareek does next.

Links

Movie Review: Gangs of Wasseypur — Part 1 and Part 2 (2012)

3 Stars (out of 4)

Buy or rent Part I and Part II at iTunes
Buy the soundtrack at Amazon

Gangs of Wasseypur debuted on the festival circuit as a five-hour-plus Indian crime epic. When it finally released into theaters (and on DVD), the film was chopped into two halves, released months apart as Gangs of Wasseypur Part I and Part II. It’s a decision that makes sense from a distribution standpoint, but it does the film a disservice.

Gangs of Wasseypur is truly a single film written with a place for a pause in the middle to grab snacks, not for a break of several weeks. Like those who saw the film in the theater, I watched the DVDs weeks apart, and I think the viewing experience suffered for it. If you have the opportunity to watch both parts of Gangs of Wasseypur back-to-back, do it.

With that caveat, how does the film stand up as a cohesive work? Director Anurag Kashyap is something of an outlier in Indian cinema due to his willingness to let scenes breathe and unfold at their own pace. It’s wonderful to watch, but not indefinitely. There’s so much material in Gangs of Wasseypur that I would have enjoyed it more as two distinct films with two sets of midpoints, climaxes, and denouements. As it exists, Gangs of Wasseypur is a bit too much.

The plot chronicles a story of revenge that spans multiple generations of two families in the town of Wasseypur. After the British depart India in 1947, a young industrialist named Ramadhir Singh (Tigmanshu Dhulia) assumes control of the local mine. He hires a goon named Shahid Khan (Jaideep Ahlawat) to force the local laborers to work in deplorable conditions.

One night, Ramadhir overhears Shahid talking to his son, Sardar Khan, and his cousin, Nasir (Piyush Mishra, the film’s narrator) about his plans to kill Ramadhir and take over the mine himself. Ramadhir acts first, luring Shahid to his death, though his plot to murder Sardar and Nasir fails. Young Sardar vows to one day murder Ramadhir in retaliation, eventually passing on his hatred of the industrialist to his own sons.

That setup encompasses about the first hour of the film. The remaining four hours deal with the ongoing power struggle between the Singhs and the Khans and the resulting bloodshed. This is a gory film by any standard, but especially so compared to other Hindi films.

The bulk of the story centers on the two most charismatic members of the Khan family: Sardar (Manoj Bajpai) and his second oldest son, Faizal (Nawazuddin Siddiqui). Rather than murdering Ramadhir outright, Sardar plots to become his equal and destroy everything Ramadhir has built. Sardar makes a fortune stealing iron ore and intimidating the populace. This long game gives Sardar time to raise a family (or two) while plotting his revenge.

Sardar is an interesting choice for a lead character because he’s an awful person, regardless of his tragic beginnings. In addition to being a violent crook, he’s a terrible husband to his first wife, Nagma (Richa Chadda), whom he abandons to marry a second woman, Durga (Reema Sen), whom he eventually leaves to return to Nagma. At various times, Sardar neglects his four sons with Nagma and his one son with Durga. To varying degrees, all of his children hate him as much as they fear and respect him.

Such a negative character only works as a lead because Manoj Bajpai is so talented. Sardar shares moments of genuine affection with both of his wives when he’s not being a total narcissist. Bajpai plays Sardar with such swagger and menace that it’s easy to understand how he achieves the success he does.

Faizal is not much like his father. With an older brother, Danish (Vineet Singh), as Sardar’s natural heir, Faizal can waste his time getting stoned. Circumstances eventually force him to take a more active role in the family business, and Faizal proves to be unexpectedly ruthless.

Nawazuddin Siddiqui owns every scene he’s in. He’s talented enough to make scenes in which Faizal sits starring some of the most riveting scenes in the movie. Faizal’s conflicted feelings about his violent lifestyle make him more relatable than his father, and he’s downright charming as he woos the lovely Mohsina (Huma Qureshi).

The problem inherent in revenge films is that the characters often have little room for growth. Either they get their revenge, or they don’t, whether by choice or failure. Revenge is an okay motive for a shorter movie, but my interest waned after the third hour or so.

Also at around the three-hour mark, the story pushes two new characters to the forefront: Sardar’s two youngest sons, Definite (Zaishan Quadri) and Babua (Aditya Kumar). At that point — about 60% of the way through the film — I didn’t have the energy to get invested in two essentially brand new characters. Had Gangs of Wasseypur Part II been a proper sequel, the introduction of the new characters wouldn’t have seemed so late.

What ultimately makes the film worth seeing is Kashyap’s directing style. In addition to letting the scenes breathe, he uses music to incredible effect. He has mastered the montage. In addition to star turns by Bajpai and Siddiqui, Kashyap gets great performances out of the rest of the cast as well.

Gangs of Wasseypur would’ve been better as two distinct films, but I applaud Kashyap’s effort in trying to push the boundaries of Indian cinema.

Links