Buy the DVD at Amazon
Buy the soundtrack at Amazon
Tamasha (“Spectacle“) doesn’t give as much as it asks of its audience in return. Writer-director Imtiaz Ali asks the audience to buy into his characters’ romantic struggles without giving enough reasons why we should care.
The romance is founded on a questionable gimmick: two strangers meet while vacationing in Corsica, and they vow to spend a week together pretending to be people they are not. They take on identities from old films, with the man (Ranbir Kapoor) posing as Don, and the woman (Deepika Padukone) assuming the moniker Mona Darling.
Their courtship hinges on the two of them not knowing a thing about one another, which means that the audience doesn’t know anything about them either. All we know about Don is that he liked stories as a kid and presently — the Corsica sequence is a flashback — performs as a tin man in a stage play. We know nothing about Mona.
The false identity gimmick makes it hard to care about these mysterious characters as they cavort about France. Ali trots out his signature trope — the spontaneous parade — in the song “Matargashti,” an event that is supposed to be charming but comes off as forced and unrealistic.
Several years after their French dalliance, Mona and Don meet again in Delhi, revealing to each other their true names: Tara and Ved. However, Ved is a boring, goateed tech guy — nothing like the ebullient Don. Tara tries a relationship with Ved, but finds that she longs for the side of him that she met in Corsica.
Despite the tagline on the movie poster — “Why always the same story?” — Tamasha is a too familiar tale of a bubbly woman teaching a bland guy how to live. As per the template, Tara has no identity of her own apart from her role in Ved’s personal growth.
Tara also has a buttoned-up corporate job, but how does she feel about it? Why aren’t scenes of her at work shot with the same grey tone that colors scenes of Ved at work, as though he’s walking under a cloud even indoors? What does she want from life, other than to be with Ved? Padukone does her best within her characters’ limitations, as does Kapoor.
As a lead character, Ved is a disappointment. He blames his mundane existence on his father, who pushed him into engineering. When Tara points out that there’s more to Ved than his job, he lashes out at her, as though angered at her nerve for suggesting that he is the source of his own unhappiness.
A lot of people hate their jobs, but it doesn’t make them dull automatons in their off hours. There’s a reason why plenty of authors are former lawyers who wrote their debut novels in spare hours over the weekend. If you have a story to tell, you find a way to tell it. Ved chose to be a dull jerk, and it’s unpleasant to watch him punish Tara for his own choices.
There’s a trivial-sounding question that actually gets at the heart of why Ved fails as a lead character: why is he in Corsica? Are we supposed to believe that an over-scheduled working stiff like Ved planned a solo vacation in an exotic resort spot like an island off the coast of France? Since everything we know about Ved points to the answer “no,” then what is he doing there? I’m curious as to whether Imtiaz Ali knows.
“Despite the tagline on the movie poster — “Why always the same story?” — Tamasha is a too familiar tale of a bubbly woman teaching a bland guy how to live. As per the template, Tara has no identity of her own apart from her role in Ved’s personal growth.”
This is so true! It’s the same coming of age story tied in with romance where it’s all about the guy and the girl is just there to complete his story.
I felt that I enjoyed the movie more when Deepika was on the screen but sadly they didn’t develop her character at all. Perhaps this should’ve been about her love story lol at least then the story and characters would make sense.
Wasn’t it so disappointing when Deepika’s character disappeared in the second half of the film? I am happy to watch her in anything.
Yeah! I was like I want to watch her, come baaack lol
Well for me I just couldn’t get past the main premise. If Ved was such a grumpy little fusspot back in India, what is it about the dirt in Corsica that magically transforms him? You take yourself wherever you go, after all. And why would the girl (who is a happy person in general) be so mesmerized by this morose soul anyway?
Logically he would come to Corsica as just as much of a fusspot as he was always, get transformed by Deepika, fall in love with her and then he would hunt her down. But I guess that plot would just make this film ‘Jab We Met’, a far better movie.
“You take yourself wherever you go” — well said. None of the character motivations make sense. Seeing Tara sobbing and publicly begging Ved to come back was embarrassing. I’m one of the few people who didn’t like Jab We Met, and Tamasha had a lot of the same character faults that JWM had.
Pingback: Opening December 18: Dilwale and Bajirao Mastani | Access Bollywood
Pingback: This Week, Part 1 (Dec. 18-20, 2015) – Online Film Critics Society
Pingback: This Week, Part 2 (Dec. 18-20, 2015) – Online Film Critics Society
Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: January 4, 2016 | Access Bollywood
i guess a.r. rahman’s music was the only good thing in the movie
Pingback: Bollywood Box Office: July 14-16, 2017 | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Streaming Video News: August 2, 2018 | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Streaming Video News: July 25, 2020 | Access Bollywood
Pingback: Streaming Video News: July 21, 2022 | Access Bollywood