Movie Review: Rann (2010)

2.5 Stars (out of 4)

Buy or rent the movie at iTunes
Buy the DVD at Amazon
Buy the soundtrack at Amazon

It’s both sad and comforting to know that, on the other side of the world, people are as distrustful of the mainstream media as they are in America.

Rann (“Battle”) explores news organizations’ struggle for ratings supremacy and their ability to steer public opinion based on their coverage of news stories.

Amitabh Bachchan stars as Vijay Hashvardan Malik, a TV news pioneer who prides himself on truthfulness. As Vijay’s network loses advertisers to rivals that engage in tabloid journalism, his son, Jay (Sudeep), struggles to convince him to add more sensationalism to the network’s broadcasts.

With the network’s financial trouble widely known, Jay’s brother-in-law, Naveen (Rajat Kapoor), proposes to Jay a plan to save the network: favorable coverage of a shady politician named Mohan Pandey (Paresh Rawal) in exchange for advertising dollars from Naveen’s company.

Jay conveniently comes into possession of a video that tarnishes the reputation of Pandey’s main political rival. Jay convinces his father to broadcast the video in the name of truthfulness, and suddenly the network’s financial problems disappear.

A new reporter at the network, Purab (Ritesh Deshmukh), grows suspicious and investigates the politician’s story. What he discovers shakes his faith in the industry and in Vijay, the man who inspired him to become a journalist.

The collusion between the industrialists, politicians and networks is eerie and believable.  Bachchan and Deshmukh are quietly effective as a pair of idealists who come to realize that they’re playing a rigged game. Rawal is especially creepy as Pandey, who laughs off the bloodshed he inflicts as though it were a natural part of politics.

[I have a question for any Indian readers: Pandey is flanked by bodyguards who openly carry machine guns. I’ve seen this in other Hindi movies as well. Do politicians in India really travel with such visibly heavily armed guards? Just curious.]

Despite the universal appeal of the story, American audiences may struggle with poorly translated English subtitles. The subtitles also occasionally get lost against background shots of news programs with moving crawls at the bottom of the screen.

I’ve only seen two of Ram Gopal Varma’s films, but it’s clear that he’s an auteur with a distinct style and a love of filmmaking technique. In fact, I’d say he suffers from an over-reliance on camera technique. His cameras constantly swoop for dramatic effect and zoom in for close-ups of the actors’ faces. On those rare occasions when the camera is static, it’s positioned underneath a glass coffee table, or the shot is framed by an actor’s foot resting on said coffee table. Varma also inserts hilariously over-the-top musical cues to alert the audience whenever anything of import happens.

I found these directorial tics distracting in Varma’s Sarkar Raj, and they bugged me in Rann, as well. Rann‘s plot is riveting and so well acted that I wanted to focus on the story, not on the cinematography. With a story this good, we in the audience know how we’re supposed to feel without the aid of directorial gimmicks.

Rann‘s runtime is 2 hrs. 25 min.

6 thoughts on “Movie Review: Rann (2010)

  1. Pingback: Opening February 5: Striker « Access Bollywood

  2. prashal goyal

    Yes….indian politicians are surrounded by heavy security all the time….its not an exaggeration in the movie

    Reply
  3. Pingback: Movie Review: Company (2002) | Access Bollywood

  4. Animesh

    Hi Kathy, it seems you aren’t familiar with the importance of RGV on Indian cinema as a whole. Right from his first film Shiva(1989) he has changed the grammar of mainstream commercial Telugu and overall Indian filmmaking. Later he prolifically delved into whichever genre caught his fancy – road film, caper, horror, gangster flick, rom-com, political films apart from his other countless produced films.

    His Satya (1998) remains one of India’s best gangster drama with which he again changed the scene of Indian films in every aspect. I didn’t find any review of Satya in your site, so assuming you haven’t seen it yet. Please must watch it if you haven’t, because it paved the way for the new century of realistic meaningful Bollywood films. Satya, Company and Sarkar (arguably one of best Godfather remakes) are RGV’s unofficial gangster trilogy.

    Sadly the RGV films which you have reviewed are mostly from his post 2005 era where he went terribly out of form and has become worse since then. His best films which you must watch, apart from his gangster trilogy, are Shiva (1989), Raat(1992), Rangeela(1995), Bhoot(2003), Naach(2004) and much later the two parter Rakht Charitra (2012). Also his “Not a love story”(2013) if you fancy.

    His fanboys like me are still waiting for his comeback film.

    Reply
    1. Kathy Post author

      Thanks for this great comment, Animesh! It’s unfortunate that I didn’t get into Hindi film until after RGV’s best period. I guess that applies to anyone who started watching in the 21st Century. This is a valuable primer for anyone who wants to dive back into RGV’s filmography.

      Reply

Leave a Reply